I hear you completely. I have little faith that they will take our suggestions seriously.I have sent similar requests for years they just take them down "good idea" and another year passes. At one point they reached out to me to try and reassure me but its 2025 already and still not even an update with one of the aforesaid features since 2 plus years of emailing them.I love XO, because how good the organization architecture is. It is incredibly fast to get something down that sounds very good. But, yeah there are quite few issues. I've emailed the team a very long list of requests, and then responded positively and said that XO is not done. 8 sequence lanes is not enough. A, AB, and AAAB is just laughable. Lack of individual sequence length (prohibiting polyrhythms) is nonsensical. And individual sequence lane MIDI export is completely broken. What I don't have a problem with is the effects or the routing. Those are both fine. It's nice to have effects, but you really should consider using your DAW effects anyway. I don't understand why anyone would go to the trouble of setting XO up to route each track lane out as individual MIDI channels, and still play the Master channel? I have Triaz and Playbeat as well.
XO is good for making quick original drums grooves to get a song going without too much effort though. a better sequencer with more options should be high on their priority list these days. Nothing is worse than Bitwigs latest stepwise sequencer though. Its only half done. Bitwig is a great DAW but why do something halfway?
Statistics: Posted by oobesan — Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:21 pm