Actually my 'assurance' was a rhetorical device/hack, inspired by one of my groupies suggesting earlier in the thread my 'weasel words' of uncertainty/doubt that included, 'seems'.Yes the one that you started where you beclowned yourself assuring us the entire project was already open sourced and when presented with all kinds of evidence to the contrary, you continued to double down on your demonstrably fale informationJust a bit of news:
I got an email from Aodyo's dev.
They read this fast-motion Benny Hill skit of a thread (unsure how much of it)
But if this helps, think of it like you're picking the kids up from the park/party/pool and they don't want to go/aren't moving or fast enough, so you say, 'Ok well, I'm leaving...', when you really have no intention of leaving without them... and you go to the car, get in and start to drive slowly away, which finally gets the kids running.
As for Aodyo, they seem to want to eat their cake and have it too and/or walk a fine line, perhaps too fine. (We can imagine what Richard Stallman and company might say about it.)
They want to use open source but lock/tangle it up with their own proprietary code. They still want people's money while facing bankruptcy and the prospect of not being able to support their software in the future, and they want to have a 'presence' on GitHub, a place that is generally understood as offering mostly open source software. The whole thing seems like a bit of a kludge/clusterfuck or whatever,, especially at this point...
Like our, likely tanking, musical chairs 'proprietary' pseudoeconomy... tanking perhaps in large part precisely because it is 'proprietary'.
Statistics: Posted by Borbolactic — Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:51 am